WICCI’s Fisheries Working Group investigates the effects of Wisconsin’s changing climate on fish populations, aquatic communities, and fisheries, and shares solutions and adaptation strategies. Our group focuses on all types of fisheries in and around Wisconsin — from trout streams to inland lakes and rivers to the Great Lakes.
Our working group is always interested in involvement from researchers, managers, and conservation practitioners working in fisheries climate adaptation. We are especially interested in students and early career professionals looking to collaborate. Please contact Zach Feiner (Zachary.Feiner@wisconsin.gov) and Alex Latzka (Alexander.Latzka@wisconsin.gov) if you are interested.
Summary of Issues and Impacts

Fishing is an important part of the culture and economy in Wisconsin, with an estimated 2 million anglers generating $1.7 billion in economic activity annually. The water-rich Wisconsin landscape has thousands of valued fisheries — 15,000 inland lakes, 42,000 miles of perennial streams and rivers, 15,000 miles of classified trout water, 1,000 miles of Great Lakes shorelines.
The fish that call these habitats home all depend on water temperatures, lake levels, and stream flows to which they’re adapted. But these habitats are changing, and the fish that can live in these waters are changing.
Lakes and streams are getting warmer. Ice seasons are getting shorter, with ice-off dates becoming earlier and more variable. We are seeing more variable stream flows and lake levels as we vary between periods of above average precipitation and drought.
More frequent extreme storms and heat events that are already happening as the climate warms are damaging fish habitat and stressing fisheries. These impacts will intensify as the climate continues to warm.
Wisconsin’s cool and coldwater fishes, including some of the most popular and sought-after fish, are particularly at risk. These species include lake, brown, and brook trout, cisco, lake whitefish, walleye, muskellunge, and yellow perch. Without action, climate-driven habitat loss combined with other threats may devastate local cool and coldwater fish populations.
At the same time, warmwater species like largemouth bass, bluegill, and crappie are thriving — populations are reaching high densities in places they previously did poorly, and fish are growing to desirable sizes for anglers.
Reduced Cool and Coldwater Fish Habitat
Increasing temperatures will reduce habitat availability for iconic cool and coldwater fish, like brook trout, cisco, lake trout, and walleye.
Expanded Ranges and Larger Populations of Warmwater fish
The range and population growth of warmwater fish, like bass and sunfish, are increasing due to warming lakes and streams.
Increased Frequency of Fish Kills
Extreme heat events will increase the frequency of fish kills that may have negative long-term consequences for fish populations.
Changing Ice Fishing and Spawning Conditions
Shorter, warmer winters and increasingly unpredictable spring and fall conditions will limit ice fishing opportunities, change the timing of fish spawning and reduce the survival of newly hatched fish.
Increased Impacts from Invasive Species
Warming waters will increase the potential for expansion of invasive species and exacerbate the negative effects of current invasive species.


Recommended Solutions/Strategies
When faced with changes to our fisheries, we can only respond in three ways:
- Resist the change, and try to keep the fisheries we’ve always had
- Accept that change is occurring, bringing about different fisheries
- Direct the change in a new direction, trying to create fisheries that may not occur otherwise
This “R-A-D” framework for thinking about change and adaptation is being used for a range of natural resource issues across the country, and structures how our group is thinking about recommended solutions and strategies. For key reading on existing strategies, see our group’s publication resist-accept-direct (RAD) considerations for climate change adaptation in fisheries: the Wisconsin experience.
Resist strategies form the backbone of Wisconsin’s adaptation framework for fisheries impacted by climate change. What can we do to resist change?
Conserve stronghold populations of vulnerable cold and coolwater fish in the most resilient locations by increasing protections of critical streams and watersheds for native fish and restoring habitat (for example, making stream channels narrow and deep, reducing streambank erosion, reconnecting streams to floodplains and wetlands, planting trees to shade streams, promoting land covers and lakeshore practices that improve water quality).
- Explore: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resource’s Brook Trout Reserves program
Strategically rehabilitate heavily impacted populations through a combination of place-based techniques. This strategy requires identifying high-priority lakes with cool or coldwater fish, developing place-based rehabilitation plans with local partners, and carrying out those actions that may include harvest limitation, stocking, habitat remediation, food web manipulations, and best management practices for water quality and nearshore habitat.
Ensure areas of refuge are accessible to cool and coldwater species by removing barriers to fish movements like dams and perched culverts that disconnect streams from cold headwaters, and reducing nutrient runoff that can make the deep, coldwater layer of lakes inhospitable.
- Explore: Reconnecting Habitat and Cisco Refuge Project in Minnesota
Strategically stock species, size classes, and genetic strains that are most likely to meet recreational and cultural demands. Stocking should be viewed as one tool to use where necessary, but since climate change creates a habitat problem that stocking does not address, stocking should not be viewed as a silver bullet.
Prevent expansion of invasive species via outreach and education, best management practices, and expanded invasive species monitoring.
- Explore: Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention
Protect commercially and recreationally important Great Lakes fisheries, such as yellow perch and whitefish, through harvest control rules and protection of spawning and nursery habitats.


Choosing to not resist change may be the only feasible option in some cases and may actually lead to more desirable outcomes in others. So where and why should we accept or direct change?
In some places, embrace the expansion and growth of warmwater fish populations like largemouth bass, bluegill, and crappie, especially where resistance of coolwater fish declines is unlikely to be successful.
Help enhance naturally expanding populations of warmwater species by enacting regulations and pursuing habitat restoration projects that are likely to produce desirable outcomes, for instance by altering panfish bag limits to produce desired size structures.
If habitat cannot support natural reproduction, reprioritize management toward put-and-take fisheries in places where it is critical to continue the fishery and where alternative species are not desired or well-suited for the habitat.
Direct change toward new fishery types. While difficult, this strategy can expand fishing opportunities and support fishing culture in Wisconsin. For instance, could warmer-tolerant hybrid saugeye populations be stocked in some places now unsuitable for walleye? Could certain genetic strains be better adapted to current and future conditions? Is there a social desire for these new fisheries?
Environmental and Climate Justice Issues
Fish and fisheries are not just economic engines for the state — they are part of our culture, our food, and our identity. For many communities, changes to our fisheries can threaten those identities. It is imperative to involve these communities in climate adaptation efforts moving forward.

Ojibwe tribes, native to much of what is now Wisconsin, share a relationship with giigoonyag (fish plural) to meet spiritual, cultural, and subsistence needs. Giigoonyag are viewed as gifts from their creator, and the Ojibwe people feel a responsibility to take care of these gifts now and for the seven generations to come, a philosophy shared among many Indigenous North American Nations.
- Explore: GLIFWC’s Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu and Vulnerability Assessment (pdf), Ojibwe perspective on a case study about R-A-D options for ogaa (walleye) management, and two-eyed seeing.
Recreational anglers also have strong cultural connections with our fisheries. Many who fish consider it a core part of their identity and recall formative experiences fishing with parents or grandparents on lakes and streams in Wisconsin.
Being able to provide meals for family or friends is not to be overlooked, and for low-income communities, those meals are critical.
Wisconsin is home to a large population of Hmong people, who have a strong cultural connection to the natural world, especially through hunting and gathering.
Resources
Our working group maintains an extensive list of research papers, technical reports, news articles, and other media published on fisheries and climate change in Wisconsin. Many of these have at least one author from our working group. You can view the full list, and below are some highlights.
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.
Academic Papers
Feiner et al. 2022. Resist-accept-direct (RAD) considerations for climate change adaptation in fisheries: The Wisconsin experience. Open Access
Xu et al. 2024. Asymmetric impacts of climate change on thermal habitat suitability for inland lake fishes. Open Access
Barta et al. 2024. Lagging spawning and increasing phenological extremes jeopardize walleye (Sander vitreus) in north-temperate lakes. Open Access
Embke et al. 2025. Healing Ogaa (Walleye Sander vitreus) Waters: Lessons and Future Directions for Inland Fisheries Rehabilitation.
Maitland and Latzka 2022. Shifting climate conditions affect recruitment in Midwestern stream trout, but depend on seasonal and spatial context. Open Access
Shultz et al. 2022. Case study: Applying the resist–accept–direct framework to an Ojibwe Tribe’s relationship with the natural world. Open Access
Paukert et al. 2021. Climate change effects on North American fish and fisheries to inform adaptation strategies.
Tingley III et al. 2019. Adapting to climate change: guidance of the management of inland glacial lake fisheries (pdf).
Embke et al. 2019. Production dynamics reveal hidden overharvest of inland recreational fisheries (pdf).
Mitro et al. 2019. Projected changes in brook trout and brown trout distribution in Wisconsin streams in the mid-twenty-first century in response to climate change (pdf).
Magee et al. 2019. Scientific advances and adaptation strategies for Wisconsin lakes facing climate change (pdf).
Hansen et al. 2017. Projected shifts in fish species dominance in Wisconsin lakes under climate change (pdf).
Agency Publications
GLIFWC Climate Adaptation Menu: Dibaginjigaadeg Anishinaabe Ezhitwaad: A Tribal Climate Adaptation Menu
GLIFWC Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Aanji-bimaadiziimagak o’ow aki: Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Version 2
Wisconsin DNR Brook Trout Reserves Storymap: Conserving a Native Stream Trout in a Warming World
Wisconsin DNR Walleye Plan: Walleye 2022 – An Updated 10-Year Walleye Management Plan for Wisconsin
Wisconsin DNR Trout Plan: Wisconsin Inland Trout Management Plan 2020-2029
Wisconsin DNR Panfish Plan: A 10-Year Strategic Plan for Managing Wisconsin’s Panfish
News Articles
WUWM: Wisconsin’s warming winters impact iconic lake whitefish and anglers who icefish for them
Croix 360: Wisconsin DNR identifies priority places to protect to help brook trout persist in a changing world
Appleton Post Crescent: As Wisconsin’s climate gets warmer and wetter, beloved winter activities could be in jeopardy
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Climate change is making conditions harder for Wisconsin trout. But there is hope
UW–Madison News: Report: Scales tipping against walleye; time to get hooked on new fish
Spectrum News 1: Some Wisconsin lakes may lose their walleye, studies suggest. How can fisheries adapt?
Spectrum News 1: Climate Connections: Wisconsin’s lakes are warming up. That may spell trouble for species below the surface
Wisconsin Public Radio: Anglers and tribal fishers may need to find a new catch as climate change threatens walleye
Videos
Podcasts/Radio
Spot Burn Podcast: Will Brook Trout Survive in Wisconsin – Part 1 and Part 2
Outdoor Journal Radio – The Podcast: Are our walleye populations in trouble?
Wisconsin Public Radio, The Morning Show: Fish researcher suggests shift in walleye conservation efforts in light of climate change
Management and Data Tools
Our Team
Stakeholders and Partners
- University of Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission
- Trout Unlimited
- Wisconsin Sea Grant
- United States Geological Survey
- Center for Climatic Research, Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, UW–Madison
Members
Our membership is made up primarily of researchers and fishery managers from universities, federal agencies, the Wisconsin DNR, and the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission.
Leadership
- Zach Feiner (co-chair), Research Scientist, UW–Madison and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Zachary.Feiner@wisconsin.gov
- Alex Latzka (co-chair), Systems Biologist, Panfish Team Co-chair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Alexander.Latzka@wisconsin.gov
Fisheries Research Representatives
- Colin Dassow, Research Scientist, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Holly Embke, Research Scientist, United States Geological Survey Midwest Climate Adaptation Science Center
- Matthew Mitro, Research Scientist, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Greg Sass, Research Program Supervisor, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Titus Seilheimer, Fisheries Outreach Specialist, Wisconsin Sea Grant
- Stephanie Shaw, Research Scientist, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Iyob Tsehaye, Research Scientist, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Fisheries Management Representatives
- Paul Cunningham, Fisheries Ecologist, Northern Pike Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Gene Hatzenbeler, Treaty Fisheries Biologist, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Zach Lawson, Fisheries Biologist, Muskellunge Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Jonathan Pyatskowit, Habitat Specialist, Trout Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Adam Ray, Inland Fisheries Biologist, Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission
- Craig Roberts, Fisheries Biologist, Bass Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Aaron Shultz, Climate Change Inland Fisheries Biologist, Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission
- Bradd Sims, Rivers and Streams Systems Biologist, Trout & Habitat Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- Max Wolter, Fisheries Biologist, Walleye Team Cochair, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources





